英国留学硕士论文评分标准详解

albatrus · 发表于 2014-7-25 07:45:26

马上注册，结交更多街友，享用更多功能，让你轻松玩转华人街。

您需要登录才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？快速注册

x

英国的老师经常说的一句话就是：“小组讨论是多人完成的，但是论文必须独立完成。”所有的学生都要从小组讨论中提炼出自己的观点。同小组的学生之间观点近似并没有关系，但是论述的理由必须是自己独立思考的结果。英国老师非常注重学生自己的观点。一般能在论文中提出自己观点的学生都会被老师好好嘉奖一番。    英国留学硕士写论文的时候，老师会给一份清单，让学生找自己有兴趣的话题，而选择同一个话题的人一般就分到一个组。然后，老师会给学生一大叠相关的资料，学生要自己分工回去阅读并做笔记，看完后同一小组的人相互讨论这个话题。这样做最大的好处在于，每个学生可以节省下不少阅读时间，同时，每个学生在向他人转述资料的过程中锻炼了总结和概括大意的能力。
    英国留学硕士论文评分标准MarkCriteria
    Distinction:70+
    Comprehensivecoverageofrelevantissues
    Independentandeffectiveresearchandthinking
    Excellentorganizationandillustrationofarguments
    Excellentrangeofreferencetotheappropriateprimaryandsecondarysources
    Clearandlucidacademicwritinginadiscriminatingregister
    Near-faultlesspresentationinaccordancewiththeappropriateacademicconventions.
    Ethicalissuescentraltoallaspectsoftheproject
    Thoughtfulprojectinformedbybackgroundreadingandmakingexcellentuseofdata.Clearevaluationofmethodologicallimitations
    Sophisticated,subtleandprobinganalysisthroughout,withnear-faultlessuseoflinguisticterminology
    Merit:60–69
    Thoroughcoverageofrelevantissues
    Substantialevidenceofeffectiveresearchandindependentthinking
    Veryclearandeffectiveorganizationandillustrationofarguments
    Widerangeofreferencetotheappropriateprimaryandsecondarysources
    Clearacademicwritinginanappropriateregister
    Verygoodpresentationinaccordancewithappropriateacademicconventionswithevidenceofcarefulproofreadingandcorrection.www.17net.net
    Carefulandinformedapproachtoethicalissues
    Thoughtfulprojectdesign,withgooduseofdata
    Detailedandthoroughanalysisthroughout,withaccurateuseoflinguisticterminology
    Pass:50–59
    Faircoverageofrelevantissues,butwithsomegaps
    Evidenceofresearch,withsomeindependentthinking
    Afairrangeofreferencetotheappropriateprimaryandsecondarysources,butwithsomesignificantomissions
    Writinginanacademicregisterwithsatisfactorylevelsofprecisionandclarity
    Goodpresentationinaccordancewithappropriateacademicconventions,butevidenceofinsufficientlythoroughproof-readingandofsomeshortcomingsinreferencing,bibliography,citationandmattersofstyle.
    Somethoughtgiventoethicalissues,andconformstotheUniversityguidelines
    Coherentlydesignedproject,thoughnotalwaysactingonbackgroundreadingormethodologicallimitationstoanalysedataeffectively
    Someanalysisofferedinsupportofarguments,withlargelyaccurateuseoflinguisticterminology.
    Fail:49-40
    Significantoversightsinthecoverageofrelevantissues
    Littleevidenceofresearch
    Littlecriticalanalysisoftextsandconcepts
    Littleevidenceofindependentthinking
    Weaklyconceived,withalackofclarityandpurposeintheorganizationandillustrationoftheargument
    Alimitedrangeofreferencetoprimaryandsecondarysources
    Writinginaninappropriateregister,withlackofclarityandprecision
    Inaccuratepresentation,evidenceofweakorinconsistentuseofacademicconventions,poorproof-readingandseriousproblemswithreferencing,bibliography,citation,formattingorstyle.
    DoesnotfullyconformtotheUniversityguidelinesforethicalresearch
    Insubstantialprojectdesignproducinglittleorpooranalysisofdata.Majormethodologicallimitations
    Littleorinaccurateanalysis,withpooruseoflinguisticterminologyorconventions.
    Below40Poorcoverageofthetopic
    Verylittleevidenceofresearch
    Poorand/orderivativeuseofsecondarysources
    Organizationofmaterialisincoherent,withseriouserrorsinwrittenexpressionanduseofacademicconventions
    Seriouserrorsinuseoflinguisticterminologyandconventions

    NB.Workwhichisplagiarisedorunethicalwillincurpenaltiesandmaybeawardedamarkofzero.

欢迎您首次访问华人街请选择您所在国家进行切换：	法国	意大利	西班牙	英国	日本	德国	罗马尼亚
欢迎您首次访问华人街请选择您所在国家进行切换：	其他国家: 阿尔及利亚瑞典奥地利荷兰比利时匈牙利波兰葡萄牙捷克瑞士希腊丹麦加盟华人街

[英国留学] 英国留学硕士论文评分标准详解

马上注册，结交更多街友，享用更多功能，让你轻松玩转华人街。

浏览过的版块

联系华人街

扫描苹果APP

扫描安卓APP